Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Google Gemini 3.5 Flash VS MiniMax MiniMax M2.7

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 21 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M2.7 takes 1. MiniMax M2.7 costs 11.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $10.5 per 1M).

21
Task areas won
1
71
Avg percentile
15
0
Top-3 finishes
0
$10.5
Price / 1M tokens
$0.9
Google
Provider
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.7 costs 11.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $10.5 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Gemini 3.5 Flash MiniMax M2.7 Winner
Chef / Home Cooking #24 / 126
Usable
#124 / 126
Weak
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Training & Education #7 / 110
Excellent
#106 / 110
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
AI Strategy #23 / 126
Strong
#119 / 126
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Customer Support #12 / 113
Strong
#108 / 113
Needs editing
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Executive Assistant #19 / 112
Strong
#107 / 112
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Summarization & Meeting Notes #17 / 110
Excellent
#104 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Frontend & Landing Pages #4 / 109
Usable
#89 / 109
Weak
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Creative & Comedy #27 / 110 #108 / 110 Gemini 3.5 Flash
RAG, Safety & Grounding #15 / 113
Excellent
#94 / 113
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Coding #28 / 115
Strong
#105 / 115
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Sales #33 / 110
Strong
#108 / 110
Weak
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Presentations & Decks #17 / 110
Excellent
#83 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Knowledge & Docs #44 / 110
Strong
#108 / 110
Weak
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Data & Analytics #34 / 110
Excellent
#92 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Translation & Localization #30 / 110
Excellent
#82 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Content & Brand #46 / 124
Strong
#96 / 124
Usable
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Product & Project Management #33 / 110
Strong
#64 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Research & Competitive Analysis #65 / 110
Usable
#96 / 110
Needs editing
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Landing Pages #40 / 72
Strong
#68 / 72
Needs editing
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Investor & Pitch #56 / 66
Usable
#66 / 66
Weak
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Legal & HR #73 / 110
Strong
#81 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Structured Output #35 / 113
Excellent
#33 / 113
Excellent
MiniMax M2.7

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than MiniMax M2.7?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher in 21 and MiniMax M2.7 in 1.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 costs 11.7× less per token ($0.9 vs $10.5 per 1M).

What is Gemini 3.5 Flash better at?

Gemini 3.5 Flash out-ranks MiniMax M2.7 at Chef / Home Cooking, Training & Education, AI Strategy.

What is MiniMax M2.7 better at?

MiniMax M2.7 out-ranks Gemini 3.5 Flash at Structured Output.

Full Gemini 3.5 Flash review → Full MiniMax M2.7 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s