Claude Opus 4.5
VS
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Claude Opus 4.5 wins 16 of 22 task areas we tested; Gemini 3 Flash Preview takes 6. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 8.6× less per token ($3.5 vs $30 per 1M).
Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 8.6× less per token ($3.5 vs $30 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Assistant |
#4
/ 112
Strong
|
#92
/ 112
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Translation & Localization |
#5
/ 110
Excellent
|
#67
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#61
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#17
/ 110
Excellent
|
#71
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Structured Output |
#82
/ 113
Strong
|
#34
/ 113
Excellent
|
Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
| Creative & Comedy | #8 / 110 | #51 / 110 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#52
/ 113
Excellent
|
#13
/ 113
Excellent
|
Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
| Data & Analytics |
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
#47
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#10
/ 66
Strong
|
#47
/ 66
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Sales |
#3
/ 110
Strong
|
#35
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Landing Pages |
#7
/ 72
Strong
|
#35
/ 72
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#14
/ 126
Strong
|
#39
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| AI Strategy |
#16
/ 126
Strong
|
#38
/ 126
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Customer Support |
#56
/ 113
Strong
|
#34
/ 113
Strong
|
Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
| Content & Brand |
#21
/ 124
Strong
|
#39
/ 124
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Coding |
#39
/ 115
Strong
|
#22
/ 115
Strong
|
Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
| Legal & HR |
#30
/ 110
Excellent
|
#47
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Training & Education |
#24
/ 110
Excellent
|
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
| Product & Project Management |
#60
/ 110
Strong
|
#69
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#45
/ 110
Excellent
|
#52
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#47
/ 110
Strong
|
#49
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#2
/ 109
Usable
|
#1
/ 109
Usable
|
Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Gemini 3 Flash Preview?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.5 ranks higher in 16 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview in 6.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 8.6× less per token ($3.5 vs $30 per 1M).
What is Claude Opus 4.5 better at?
Claude Opus 4.5 out-ranks Gemini 3 Flash Preview at Executive Assistant, Translation & Localization, Summarization & Meeting Notes.
What is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better at?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview out-ranks Claude Opus 4.5 at Structured Output, RAG, Safety & Grounding, Customer Support.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals