Claude Opus 4.6
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Qwen3.7 Max wins 13 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Opus 4.6 takes 9. Qwen3.7 Max costs 6.0× less per token ($5 vs $30 per 1M).
Qwen3.7 Max costs 6.0× less per token ($5 vs $30 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured Output |
#98
/ 113
Strong
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#81
/ 113
Usable
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#59
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Presentations & Decks |
#54
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Legal & HR |
#8
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Product & Project Management |
#45
/ 110
Strong
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#51
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#12
/ 126
Strong
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#66
/ 110
Usable
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#5
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#29
/ 110
Strong
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#34
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Sales |
#4
/ 110
Strong
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Landing Pages |
#23
/ 72
Strong
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Training & Education |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Executive Assistant |
#18
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Investor & Pitch |
#8
/ 66
Strong
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Data & Analytics |
#10
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Content & Brand |
#14
/ 124
Strong
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Coding |
#18
/ 115
Excellent
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Creative & Comedy | #10 / 110 | #9 / 110 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Translation & Localization |
#2
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 13 and Claude Opus 4.6 in 9.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max costs 6.0× less per token ($5 vs $30 per 1M).
What is Claude Opus 4.6 better at?
Claude Opus 4.6 out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Legal & HR, Chef / Home Cooking, AI Strategy.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks Claude Opus 4.6 at Structured Output, Customer Support, RAG, Safety & Grounding.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals