Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite VS OpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

GPT-5.4 Mini wins 14 of 22 task areas we tested; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 8. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.0× less per token ($1.75 vs $5.25 per 1M).

8
Task areas won
14
53
Avg percentile
63
0
Top-3 finishes
2
$1.75
Price / 1M tokens
$5.25
Google
Provider
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.0× less per token ($1.75 vs $5.25 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite GPT-5.4 Mini Winner
Presentations & Decks #80 / 110
Strong
#16 / 110
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Legal & HR #86 / 110
Strong
#26 / 110
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Training & Education #33 / 110
Excellent
#79 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Research & Competitive Analysis #56 / 110
Usable
#11 / 110
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Content & Brand #43 / 124
Strong
#84 / 124
Usable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Structured Output #36 / 113
Excellent
#1 / 113
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Coding #58 / 115
Strong
#24 / 115
Strong
GPT-5.4 Mini
Customer Support #54 / 113
Strong
#21 / 113
Strong
GPT-5.4 Mini
Knowledge & Docs #33 / 110
Strong
#3 / 110
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Creative & Comedy #85 / 110 #56 / 110 GPT-5.4 Mini
Frontend & Landing Pages #10 / 109
Usable
#38 / 109
Needs editing
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Sales #67 / 110
Usable
#40 / 110
Usable
GPT-5.4 Mini
Data & Analytics #44 / 110
Excellent
#65 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Translation & Localization #39 / 110
Excellent
#21 / 110
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
RAG, Safety & Grounding #58 / 113
Excellent
#42 / 113
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Executive Assistant #101 / 112
Usable
#87 / 112
Usable
GPT-5.4 Mini
Chef / Home Cooking #70 / 126
Usable
#83 / 126
Usable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Product & Project Management #29 / 110
Excellent
#19 / 110
Excellent
GPT-5.4 Mini
Investor & Pitch #44 / 66
Usable
#52 / 66
Usable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
AI Strategy #54 / 126
Strong
#48 / 126
Strong
GPT-5.4 Mini
Summarization & Meeting Notes #13 / 110
Excellent
#19 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Landing Pages #43 / 72
Strong
#45 / 72
Usable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.4 Mini?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Mini ranks higher in 14 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 8.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.0× less per token ($1.75 vs $5.25 per 1M).

What is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better at?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite out-ranks GPT-5.4 Mini at Training & Education, Content & Brand, Frontend & Landing Pages.

What is GPT-5.4 Mini better at?

GPT-5.4 Mini out-ranks Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite at Presentations & Decks, Legal & HR, Research & Competitive Analysis.

Full Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite review → Full GPT-5.4 Mini review → Full model leaderboard → Google vs OpenAI — every model, lab against lab →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s