GPT-5.4
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
GPT-5.4 and Qwen3.7 Max split the 22 task areas we tested 11–11. Qwen3.7 Max costs 3.5× less per token ($5 vs $17.5 per 1M).
Qwen3.7 Max costs 3.5× less per token ($5 vs $17.5 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | GPT-5.4 | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Training & Education |
#69
/ 110
Strong
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#19
/ 126
Strong
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
GPT-5.4 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#29
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Data & Analytics |
#42
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Legal & HR |
#20
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Executive Assistant |
#25
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Sales |
#41
/ 110
Usable
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Translation & Localization |
#17
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Investor & Pitch |
#7
/ 66
Strong
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Landing Pages |
#22
/ 72
Strong
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Coding |
#9
/ 115
Excellent
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#5
/ 109
Usable
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Structured Output |
#9
/ 113
Excellent
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Product & Project Management |
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Content & Brand |
#7
/ 124
Strong
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
GPT-5.4 |
| Creative & Comedy | #6 / 110 | #9 / 110 | GPT-5.4 |
| Customer Support |
#13
/ 113
Strong
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#37
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#11
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
GPT-5.4 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is GPT-5.4 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
They tie across the 22 task areas we benchmarked, at 11 apiece.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max costs 3.5× less per token ($5 vs $17.5 per 1M).
What is GPT-5.4 better at?
GPT-5.4 out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Research & Competitive Analysis, Knowledge & Docs, Chef / Home Cooking.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks GPT-5.4 at Training & Education, RAG, Safety & Grounding, Data & Analytics.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals