GPT-5.5
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
GPT-5.5 wins 12 of 22 task areas we tested; Qwen3.7 Max takes 10. Qwen3.7 Max costs 7.0× less per token ($5 vs $35 per 1M).
Qwen3.7 Max costs 7.0× less per token ($5 vs $35 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | GPT-5.5 | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#7
/ 107
Excellent
|
#55
/ 107
Usable
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Training & Education |
#59
/ 107
Excellent
|
#13
/ 107
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#4
/ 126
Strong
|
#46
/ 126
Usable
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Legal & HR |
#9
/ 107
Excellent
|
#44
/ 107
Excellent
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Data & Analytics |
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#5
/ 107
Excellent
|
#33
/ 107
Strong
|
GPT-5.5 |
| AI Strategy |
#59
/ 126
Strong
|
#33
/ 126
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Executive Assistant |
#9
/ 109
Strong
|
#31
/ 109
Strong
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Sales |
#40
/ 107
Usable
|
#23
/ 107
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Coding |
#1
/ 115
Excellent
|
#16
/ 115
Excellent
|
GPT-5.5 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#2
/ 113
Strong
|
#9
/ 113
Strong
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Creative & Comedy | #2 / 107 | #8 / 107 | GPT-5.5 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#2
/ 107
Excellent
|
#8
/ 107
Excellent
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#12
/ 63
Strong
|
#15
/ 63
Strong
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Landing Pages |
#4
/ 69
Strong
|
#1
/ 69
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#8
/ 107
Excellent
|
#10
/ 107
Excellent
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Translation & Localization |
#3
/ 107
Excellent
|
#1
/ 107
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Content & Brand |
#2
/ 124
Strong
|
#1
/ 124
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#10
/ 106
Needs editing
|
#11
/ 106
Needs editing
|
GPT-5.5 |
| Product & Project Management |
#8
/ 107
Excellent
|
#7
/ 107
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Structured Output |
#3
/ 110
Excellent
|
#2
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is GPT-5.5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, GPT-5.5 ranks higher in 12 and Qwen3.7 Max in 10.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max costs 7.0× less per token ($5 vs $35 per 1M).
What is GPT-5.5 better at?
GPT-5.5 out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Research & Competitive Analysis, Chef / Home Cooking, Legal & HR.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks GPT-5.5 at Training & Education, Data & Analytics, AI Strategy.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals