Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code VS Qwen Qwen3.7 Max

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Qwen3.7 Max wins 15 of 22 task areas we tested; Kimi K2.7 Code takes 7. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.2× less per token ($4.24 vs $5 per 1M).

7
Task areas won
15
75
Avg percentile
85
1
Top-3 finishes
5
$4.24
Price / 1M tokens
$5.0
MoonshotAI
Provider
Qwen

Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.2× less per token ($4.24 vs $5 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Kimi K2.7 Code Qwen3.7 Max Winner
Content & Brand #54 / 124
Strong
#1 / 124
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max
Translation & Localization #46 / 107
Excellent
#1 / 107
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Frontend & Landing Pages #51 / 106
Needs editing
#11 / 106
Needs editing
Qwen3.7 Max
Structured Output #42 / 110
Excellent
#2 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Research & Competitive Analysis #19 / 107
Excellent
#55 / 107
Usable
Kimi K2.7 Code
Creative & Comedy #42 / 107 #8 / 107 Qwen3.7 Max
Summarization & Meeting Notes #44 / 107
Excellent
#10 / 107
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Legal & HR #14 / 107
Excellent
#44 / 107
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Executive Assistant #6 / 109
Strong
#31 / 109
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code
Training & Education #38 / 107
Excellent
#13 / 107
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Sales #46 / 107
Usable
#23 / 107
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max
Coding #37 / 115
Strong
#16 / 115
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Knowledge & Docs #16 / 107
Excellent
#33 / 107
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code
RAG, Safety & Grounding #18 / 110
Excellent
#1 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Data & Analytics #29 / 110
Excellent
#14 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
AI Strategy #41 / 126
Strong
#33 / 126
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max
Chef / Home Cooking #54 / 126
Usable
#46 / 126
Usable
Qwen3.7 Max
Investor & Pitch #11 / 63
Strong
#15 / 63
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code
Presentations & Decks #4 / 107
Excellent
#8 / 107
Excellent
Kimi K2.7 Code
Product & Project Management #10 / 107
Excellent
#7 / 107
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Landing Pages #3 / 69
Strong
#1 / 69
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max
Customer Support #8 / 113
Strong
#9 / 113
Strong
Kimi K2.7 Code

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 15 and Kimi K2.7 Code in 7.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Max?

Kimi K2.7 Code costs 1.2× less per token ($4.24 vs $5 per 1M).

What is Kimi K2.7 Code better at?

Kimi K2.7 Code out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Research & Competitive Analysis, Legal & HR, Executive Assistant.

What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?

Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks Kimi K2.7 Code at Content & Brand, Translation & Localization, Frontend & Landing Pages.

Full Kimi K2.7 Code review → Full Qwen3.7 Max review → Full model leaderboard →

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s