Claude Fable 5.1: Manchester store investment review

For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.

Verdict: Not presentable
Deck rating: 1,300
Slides: 7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality: 64%

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
A slide the judges rated as needing work

In detail

Slide 6 quotes 14,200: the landlord's unverified footfall figure of 14,200 people a day.
Slide 6: text 10 and text 11 collide.

Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished Bottom half is a bit text-heavy
Slide 3Acceptable The left column is text-heavy, with several long, multiline bullets.Every bar is the same colour, so the key bars (Christmas-adjusted pop-up against the business case assumption) are not highlighted
Slide 4Acceptable The table, explanatory note, callout and chart repeat the same comparison, making the slide unnecessarily dense.The 36-month board rule is drawn as three identical bars; a single reference line would show the threshold more clearly
Slide 5Polished
Slide 6Needs work The '(+312%)' line overlaps the bold Instagram subtitle in the right-hand panel.Right card headline '400 to 1,648 followers (+312%)' wraps to a second line and collides with the subheading 'Manchester Instagram account during the pop-up'
Slide 7Acceptable Spacing between the numbered decisions is uneven: decision 3 is crowded beneath decision 2, while a much larger gap precedes decision 4.Item 2 heading wraps to two lines, so its body text ('months.') runs almost into the item 3 heading