Qwen3.8 Max (0902): Manchester store investment review
For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,112
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
57%
Why it is not presentable
Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 6 quotes 14,200: the landlord's unverified footfall figure of 14,200 people a day.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe decision panels have substantial unused space beneath their text, while the supporting reasons are concentrated at the bottom.Both option boxes are about half empty below the bullets, which wastes space
Slide 3AcceptableAll three bars use the same colour, leaving the key adjusted run-rate visually undifferentiated.All three bars are the same colour, so nothing highlights the adjusted £2,380 against the £2,917 assumption
Slide 4Needs workThe table's narrow Sales column wraps '£1,050k' onto two lines, separating the unit from the number.The two-line title crowds the top of the chart and the table header
Slide 5AcceptableThe percentage axis uses rounded labels with apparently irregular increments; a regular labelled scale would be clearer.Y-axis tick labels are rounded unevenly (2%, 5%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 15%, 18%) for 2.5% steps, which is confusing and misaligns with the bar values (the 18% bar rises above the '18%' tick)
Slide 6AcceptableThe two panels are much taller than their contents require, creating large unused areas.The title is a topic label rather than a takeaway
Slide 7PolishedWording slip: '70-store' should read '70-seat store'
