For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,273
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
75%
Why it is not presentable
Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
In detail
Slide 5 quotes 14,200: the landlord's unverified footfall figure of 14,200 people a day.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe right-hand commentary panel is text-heavy, with the final line sitting close to its bottom edge; shorten the explanation or increase the internal bottom padding.Side panel body text runs to the bottom edge of its rounded box; the last line 'assumption.' nearly spills out and the panel looks cramped
Slide 3PolishedThe third card's heading wraps to two lines and starts higher than the other two card headings, so the row of headings is misaligned
Slide 4AcceptableA large empty area below the table makes the left side feel underused relative to the right-hand callout.Large empty area below the small table leaves the left side unbalanced against the tall callout panel
Slide 5AcceptableThe large headline figures receive more visual emphasis than the qualifications, although the qualifications carry the slide's cautionary message.Card interiors are inconsistent: the caveat lines sit at different heights in each card, and the second card has no separate caveat line
