Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Manchester store investment review
For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
867
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
50%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 4: text 3 and table 4 collide.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe title is a topic label rather than the key recommendation.Topic label 'Executive Summary' where a takeaway title (e.g. 'Approve the smaller £310k unit, not the £480k store') would serve better
Slide 3AcceptableThe two-line title sits too close to the orange divider.Title wraps to two lines and the second line 'Overstated' sits directly on the orange rule, so the text collides with it
Slide 4Needs workThe table header overlaps and clips the final line of the explanatory paragraph.The last line of the body text ('board's criteria.') is clipped by and overlaps the table header bar
Slide 5AcceptableThe left column is text-heavy, with several multi-line bullets.Y-axis tick labels are oddly rounded (2%, 5%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 15%, 18%), which looks inconsistent
Slide 6AcceptableLong, equally weighted bullets make the resolutions slower to scan.Plain text-only list largely repeating slide 2, with no emphasis on the decision figures
