Claude Haiku 4.5: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
635
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
36%
Why it is not presentable
Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
Left out a key finding
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 7 quotes 6,300: the unverified 6,300-signature petition.
Finding missing: Holloway and Marsh Lane have the fewest visits and the highest cost per visit.
Slide 1Needs workThe oversized title wraps onto a second line, and the bottom of '£350,000' is cut off by the title band.Title wraps to two lines and the second line '£350,000' is cut off by the bottom edge of the header band
Slide 2Needs workBlack percentage labels have poor contrast against the dark purple opposition segments.Black data labels (71%, 38%, 52%) sit on the dark purple 'Oppose' segments and are very hard to read
Slide 3AcceptableMost of the lower half is unused, making the layout top-heavy.Bottom half of the slide is empty
Slide 4AcceptableThe layout leaves substantial unused space below the two text columns.Large unused space in the lower half
Slide 5AcceptableThe lower half is largely unused, while all content sits near the top.Large unused space in the lower half
Slide 6AcceptableThe recommendation is clear, but its supporting case is presented as a plain text list without emphasis on the key figures.Text-only layout; the recommendation is not visually emphasised
Slide 7AcceptableTwo separate caveats receive similar emphasis, so there is no single dominant takeaway.Text-heavy paragraphs with no visual element to carry the point
