GPT-6.1 Sol: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Presentable
Deck rating
1,412
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
75%
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe recommended option B has the same visual treatment as the other rows; highlighting it would make the table reinforce the takeaway more immediately.Large empty gap between the table and the bottom takeaway line leaves the lower half unbalanced
Slide 3AcceptableLegend is placed inside the plot area, tucked tight against the B bar labels (41%/38%); it would be cleaner above or outside the chartThe x-axis stops at 60%, causing the 71% bar to awkwardly spill past the end of the chart area.
Slide 4AcceptableThe right-hand callout is text-heavy and extends well below the table, leaving the lower-left area noticeably empty.Short table leaves a large empty area beneath it on the left, unbalanced against the taller side panel
Slide 5PolishedReview line at the bottom wraps with 'Lane?' alone on the second line and sits cramped against the source footer
Slide 6PolishedThe highlighted white box gives the review condition more visual weight than the decision itself (the 'shorter hours' line), which slightly muddles emphasis