GPT-6 Sol: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,463
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
83%
Why it is not presentable
Left out a key finding
In detail
Finding missing: Holloway and Marsh Lane have the fewest visits and the highest cost per visit.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished
Slide 3AcceptablePercentage signs wrap onto separate lines beneath every value, making the chart labels unnecessarily awkward to scan.Every percentage label wraps, putting the % sign on its own line below the number (e.g. '14' over '%')
Slide 4AcceptableEach metric card combines visits and cost in one bold text block, with 'per visit' awkwardly split across lines; separate metric lines would make comparison faster.The stat lines in all three top cards wrap awkwardly, leaving 'visit' alone on a second line