Kimi K3: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,255
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
86%
Why it is not presentable
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished
Slide 3PolishedThe title introduces the consultation rather than stating its main finding; the takeaway about option B is buried in the lower-right panel.
Slide 4AcceptableThe broad topic title does not communicate the chart's main finding.Title 'How the libraries are used' is a topic label; a takeaway title (e.g. the two option A libraries cost the most per visit) would carry the point better
Slide 5AcceptableThe topic title and equally weighted cards do not identify the main conclusion of the comparison.Title 'Weighing the options' is a topic label with no takeaway