Grok 4.7: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,242
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
79%
Why it is not presentable
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
Drew a conclusion from a figure without its caveat
In detail
Caveat missing: respondents were mostly weekly users (82%, against 21% of card holders), not representative of residents.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe title labels the topic rather than stating the decision required.Topic-label title 'The decision' where a takeaway title would serve better
Slide 3PolishedTopic-label title; the takeaway (B is the only option with more support than opposition) is buried mid-panel
Slide 4Polished
Slide 5AcceptableHolloway and Marsh Lane are identified as the takeaway but receive no visual emphasis in the table.Topic-label title; the takeaway sits in a small grey subtitle
Slide 6AcceptableThe generic title and three equally weighted panels do not establish one overall takeaway.Cards are oversized for their content; the bottom half of each card is empty
Slide 7PolishedGeneric 'Recommendation' header competes with the real headline 'Adopt option B' beneath it
