DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
615
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
33%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 5: text 9: 11 pt body text.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableLarge unused space below the table makes the layout feel top-heavy.Large empty gap between the table and the footnote; the content is crowded into the top half
Slide 3Needs workBlack percentage labels have poor contrast against the dark purple opposition segments.Legend sits inside the plot area and overlaps the top of the Option C bar
Slide 4AcceptableThe title is a topic label; the main takeaway is relegated to a small grey note at the bottom.Topic title rather than a takeaway; the key point is buried in the grey footnote
Slide 5Needs workAn unsupported character appears as a small box before 'Recommended'.Missing-glyph box (tofu) before 'Recommended' in the Option B card
Slide 6Needs workMissing-glyph boxes appear before each reason and within 'Six-month', creating visible text-rendering defects.Missing-glyph boxes (tofu) before each 'Why Option B?' bullet
