Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
867
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
42%
Why it is not presentable
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
Drew a conclusion from a figure without its caveat
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Caveat missing: respondents were mostly weekly users (82%, against 21% of card holders), not representative of residents.
Slide 1PolishedThe 'Communities Directorate' subtitle has low contrast against the purple background and is too faint for reliable projected reading.
Slide 2Needs workThe final bullet spills below the grey content panel.Final sub-bullet spills out of the bottom of the grey panel
Slide 3AcceptableThe title labels the chart's subject rather than stating the key comparison or takeaway.Title is a topic label; it does not state the finding (Option B is the only one with more support than opposition)
Slide 4AcceptableLengthy explanatory bullets and a nine-row table require sustained reading rather than communicating one immediate takeaway.Title is a topic label rather than the insight
Slide 5AcceptableThe Option B description uses low-contrast lavender text on purple, making an important heading too faint.Light-purple subheading on the dark Option B card has low contrast
Slide 6Needs workThe bullet text is cramped within the white panel, with virtually no top or bottom padding; the final line crowds the bottom edge.Text box has no padding: the first line touches the top edge and the last line is clipped at the bottom edge
