Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.5 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 split the 22 task areas we tested 11–11. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 1.7× less per token ($18 vs $30 per 1M).

11
Task areas won
11
78
Avg percentile
76
3
Top-3 finishes
3
$30.0
Price / 1M tokens
$18.0
Anthropic
Provider
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 1.7× less per token ($18 vs $30 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Winner
Summarization & Meeting Notes #1 / 110
Excellent
#37 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Legal & HR #30 / 110
Excellent
#3 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Structured Output #82 / 113
Strong
#105 / 113
Usable
Claude Opus 4.5
Frontend & Landing Pages #2 / 109
Usable
#23 / 109
Needs editing
Claude Opus 4.5
RAG, Safety & Grounding #52 / 113
Excellent
#73 / 113
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Research & Competitive Analysis #17 / 110
Excellent
#35 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Training & Education #24 / 110
Excellent
#9 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
AI Strategy #16 / 126
Strong
#3 / 126
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Knowledge & Docs #47 / 110
Strong
#35 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Product & Project Management #60 / 110
Strong
#48 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Creative & Comedy #8 / 110 #19 / 110 Claude Opus 4.5
Coding #39 / 115
Strong
#29 / 115
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Content & Brand #21 / 124
Strong
#31 / 124
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Presentations & Decks #45 / 110
Excellent
#35 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Sales #3 / 110
Strong
#13 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Translation & Localization #5 / 110
Excellent
#13 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Chef / Home Cooking #14 / 126
Strong
#20 / 126
Usable
Claude Opus 4.5
Customer Support #56 / 113
Strong
#62 / 113
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Investor & Pitch #10 / 66
Strong
#4 / 66
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Data & Analytics #9 / 110
Excellent
#6 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Executive Assistant #4 / 112
Strong
#1 / 112
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Landing Pages #7 / 72
Strong
#5 / 72
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Same task, both models — judged

Both models answered the same test case; an independent judge graded each. Quotes are the judge's actual rationale.

Frontend & Landing Pages

Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech (Landing Page Build)
Claude Opus 4.5 76/100

“Copy is highly specific, benefit-led, and strictly adheres to compliance constraints without hype. Desktop design is clean and professional. However, the mobile layout is fundamentally broken with severe horizontal overflow across all sections.”

Claude Sonnet 4.6 32/100

“vision judge failed: litellm.AuthenticationError: GeminiException - { "error": { "code": 400, "message": "API key not valid. Please pass a valid API key.", "status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT", "details": [ { "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.ErrorInfo", "reason": "API_KEY_INVALID", "domain": "googleapis.com", "metadata": { "service": "generativelanguage.googleapis.com" } }, { "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.LocalizedMessage", "locale": "en-US", "message": "API key not valid. Please pass a valid API key." } ] } } ”

Frequently asked

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Claude Sonnet 4.6?

They tie across the 22 task areas we benchmarked, at 11 apiece.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 1.7× less per token ($18 vs $30 per 1M).

What is Claude Opus 4.5 better at?

Claude Opus 4.5 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 4.6 at Summarization & Meeting Notes, Structured Output, Frontend & Landing Pages.

What is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better at?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 out-ranks Claude Opus 4.5 at Legal & HR, Training & Education, AI Strategy.

Full Claude Opus 4.5 review → Full Claude Sonnet 4.6 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s