Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.5 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 16 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Sonnet 5 takes 6. Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.5× less per token ($12 vs $30 per 1M).

16
Task areas won
6
78
Avg percentile
62
3
Top-3 finishes
1
$30.0
Price / 1M tokens
$12.0
Anthropic
Provider
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.5× less per token ($12 vs $30 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 5 Winner
Creative & Comedy #8 / 110 #79 / 110 Claude Opus 4.5
Executive Assistant #4 / 112
Strong
#72 / 112
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Summarization & Meeting Notes #1 / 110
Excellent
#58 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Frontend & Landing Pages #2 / 109
Usable
#57 / 109
Needs editing
Claude Opus 4.5
Content & Brand #21 / 124
Strong
#67 / 124
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Translation & Localization #5 / 110
Excellent
#41 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
RAG, Safety & Grounding #52 / 113
Excellent
#86 / 113
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Coding #39 / 115
Strong
#6 / 115
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
Investor & Pitch #10 / 66
Strong
#39 / 66
Usable
Claude Opus 4.5
Knowledge & Docs #47 / 110
Strong
#18 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Training & Education #24 / 110
Excellent
#52 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Legal & HR #30 / 110
Excellent
#57 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Presentations & Decks #45 / 110
Excellent
#22 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
AI Strategy #16 / 126
Strong
#2 / 126
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Chef / Home Cooking #14 / 126
Strong
#28 / 126
Usable
Claude Opus 4.5
Sales #3 / 110
Strong
#16 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Structured Output #82 / 113
Strong
#69 / 113
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Data & Analytics #9 / 110
Excellent
#16 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.5
Landing Pages #7 / 72
Strong
#12 / 72
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Research & Competitive Analysis #17 / 110
Excellent
#15 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
Customer Support #56 / 113
Strong
#57 / 113
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5
Product & Project Management #60 / 110
Strong
#61 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.5

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Claude Sonnet 5?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.5 ranks higher in 16 and Claude Sonnet 5 in 6.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs 2.5× less per token ($12 vs $30 per 1M).

What is Claude Opus 4.5 better at?

Claude Opus 4.5 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 5 at Creative & Comedy, Executive Assistant, Summarization & Meeting Notes.

What is Claude Sonnet 5 better at?

Claude Sonnet 5 out-ranks Claude Opus 4.5 at Coding, Knowledge & Docs, Presentations & Decks.

Full Claude Opus 4.5 review → Full Claude Sonnet 5 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s