Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 VS xAI Grok 4.20

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.20: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Opus 4.8 wins 20 of 22 task areas we tested; Grok 4.20 takes 2. Grok 4.20 costs 8.0× less per token ($3.75 vs $30 per 1M).

20
Task areas won
2
87
Avg percentile
30
6
Top-3 finishes
0
$30.0
Price / 1M tokens
$3.75
Anthropic
Provider
xAI

Grok 4.20 costs 8.0× less per token ($3.75 vs $30 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Opus 4.8 Grok 4.20 Winner
Content & Brand #8 / 124
Strong
#118 / 124
Needs editing
Claude Opus 4.8
Data & Analytics #2 / 110
Excellent
#102 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Chef / Home Cooking #9 / 126
Strong
#100 / 126
Needs editing
Claude Opus 4.8
Training & Education #2 / 110
Excellent
#88 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
RAG, Safety & Grounding #11 / 113
Excellent
#96 / 113
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Sales #1 / 110
Strong
#85 / 110
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Coding #3 / 115
Excellent
#86 / 115
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Legal & HR #5 / 110
Excellent
#87 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Creative & Comedy #17 / 110 #96 / 110 Claude Opus 4.8
Executive Assistant #9 / 112
Strong
#83 / 112
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Knowledge & Docs #2 / 110
Excellent
#70 / 110
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Translation & Localization #35 / 110
Excellent
#98 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Customer Support #8 / 113
Strong
#68 / 113
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
AI Strategy #4 / 126
Strong
#59 / 126
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Product & Project Management #2 / 110
Excellent
#56 / 110
Strong
Claude Opus 4.8
Summarization & Meeting Notes #35 / 110
Excellent
#85 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Landing Pages #18 / 72
Strong
#66 / 72
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Research & Competitive Analysis #5 / 110
Excellent
#52 / 110
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Investor & Pitch #27 / 66
Strong
#59 / 66
Usable
Claude Opus 4.8
Presentations & Decks #32 / 110
Excellent
#46 / 110
Excellent
Claude Opus 4.8
Structured Output #61 / 113
Excellent
#48 / 113
Excellent
Grok 4.20
Frontend & Landing Pages #21 / 109
Needs editing
#15 / 109
Needs editing
Grok 4.20

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Grok 4.20?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher in 20 and Grok 4.20 in 2.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.20?

Grok 4.20 costs 8.0× less per token ($3.75 vs $30 per 1M).

What is Claude Opus 4.8 better at?

Claude Opus 4.8 out-ranks Grok 4.20 at Content & Brand, Data & Analytics, Chef / Home Cooking.

What is Grok 4.20 better at?

Grok 4.20 out-ranks Claude Opus 4.8 at Structured Output, Frontend & Landing Pages.

Full Claude Opus 4.8 review → Full Grok 4.20 review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s