Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 VS Qwen Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Qwen3.7 Max wins 12 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 10. Qwen3.7 Max costs 3.6× less per token ($5 vs $18 per 1M).

10
Task areas won
12
76
Avg percentile
84
3
Top-3 finishes
3
$18.0
Price / 1M tokens
$5.0
Anthropic
Provider
Qwen

Qwen3.7 Max costs 3.6× less per token ($5 vs $18 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Sonnet 4.6 Qwen3.7 Max Winner
Structured Output #105 / 113
Usable
#2 / 113
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
RAG, Safety & Grounding #73 / 113
Excellent
#1 / 113
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Customer Support #62 / 113
Strong
#11 / 113
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max
Legal & HR #3 / 110
Excellent
#46 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Product & Project Management #48 / 110
Strong
#7 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
AI Strategy #3 / 126
Strong
#36 / 126
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Chef / Home Cooking #20 / 126
Usable
#47 / 126
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Presentations & Decks #35 / 110
Excellent
#9 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Summarization & Meeting Notes #37 / 110
Excellent
#12 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Research & Competitive Analysis #35 / 110
Strong
#58 / 110
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Content & Brand #31 / 124
Strong
#10 / 124
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max
Investor & Pitch #4 / 66
Strong
#19 / 66
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Translation & Localization #13 / 110
Excellent
#1 / 110
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Sales #13 / 110
Strong
#24 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding #29 / 115
Strong
#19 / 115
Excellent
Qwen3.7 Max
Creative & Comedy #19 / 110 #9 / 110 Qwen3.7 Max
Data & Analytics #6 / 110
Excellent
#15 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Frontend & Landing Pages #23 / 109
Needs editing
#14 / 109
Needs editing
Qwen3.7 Max
Executive Assistant #1 / 112
Strong
#7 / 112
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Landing Pages #5 / 72
Strong
#10 / 72
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Training & Education #9 / 110
Excellent
#13 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Knowledge & Docs #35 / 110
Strong
#34 / 110
Strong
Qwen3.7 Max

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 12 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 in 10.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max costs 3.6× less per token ($5 vs $18 per 1M).

What is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better at?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Legal & HR, AI Strategy, Chef / Home Cooking.

What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?

Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks Claude Sonnet 4.6 at Structured Output, RAG, Safety & Grounding, Customer Support.

Full Claude Sonnet 4.6 review → Full Qwen3.7 Max review → Full model leaderboard → Anthropic vs Qwen — every model, lab against lab →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s