Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

DeepSeek DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus VS xAI Grok 4.20 Beta

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Grok 4.20 Beta: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Grok 4.20 Beta wins 12 of 22 task areas we tested; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 10. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 6.6× less per token ($1.22 vs $8 per 1M).

10
Task areas won
12
36
Avg percentile
36
0
Top-3 finishes
0
$1.22
Price / 1M tokens
$8.0
DeepSeek
Provider
xAI

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 6.6× less per token ($1.22 vs $8 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Grok 4.20 Beta Winner
Summarization & Meeting Notes #32 / 110
Excellent
#95 / 110
Excellent
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Chef / Home Cooking #95 / 126
Usable
#38 / 126
Usable
Grok 4.20 Beta
AI Strategy #101 / 126
Usable
#49 / 126
Strong
Grok 4.20 Beta
Sales #97 / 110
Needs editing
#46 / 110
Usable
Grok 4.20 Beta
Training & Education #31 / 110
Excellent
#76 / 110
Strong
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Research & Competitive Analysis #46 / 110
Strong
#86 / 110
Needs editing
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Knowledge & Docs #50 / 110
Usable
#86 / 110
Usable
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Data & Analytics #56 / 110
Excellent
#91 / 110
Excellent
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Presentations & Decks #91 / 110
Strong
#56 / 110
Strong
Grok 4.20 Beta
Investor & Pitch #64 / 66
Needs editing
#43 / 66
Usable
Grok 4.20 Beta
Structured Output #63 / 113
Excellent
#43 / 113
Excellent
Grok 4.20 Beta
Landing Pages #44 / 72
Strong
#60 / 72
Usable
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Coding #92 / 115
Usable
#77 / 115
Strong
Grok 4.20 Beta
Legal & HR #95 / 110
Strong
#106 / 110
Strong
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Translation & Localization #101 / 110
Strong
#90 / 110
Strong
Grok 4.20 Beta
Executive Assistant #77 / 112
Usable
#69 / 112
Strong
Grok 4.20 Beta
RAG, Safety & Grounding #85 / 113
Excellent
#93 / 113
Strong
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Product & Project Management #36 / 110
Strong
#31 / 110
Excellent
Grok 4.20 Beta
Creative & Comedy #89 / 110 #92 / 110 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Customer Support #69 / 113
Usable
#72 / 113
Usable
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Content & Brand #100 / 124
Usable
#99 / 124
Usable
Grok 4.20 Beta
Frontend & Landing Pages #33 / 109
Needs editing
#32 / 109
Needs editing
Grok 4.20 Beta

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Grok 4.20 Beta?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Grok 4.20 Beta ranks higher in 12 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus in 10.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Grok 4.20 Beta?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 6.6× less per token ($1.22 vs $8 per 1M).

What is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better at?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus out-ranks Grok 4.20 Beta at Summarization & Meeting Notes, Training & Education, Research & Competitive Analysis.

What is Grok 4.20 Beta better at?

Grok 4.20 Beta out-ranks DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus at Chef / Home Cooking, AI Strategy, Sales.

Full DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus review → Full Grok 4.20 Beta review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s