DeepSeek V4 Pro
VS
MiniMax M2.7
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax M2.7: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
DeepSeek V4 Pro wins 22 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M2.7 takes 0. MiniMax M2.7 costs 1.4× less per token ($0.9 vs $1.305 per 1M).
MiniMax M2.7 costs 1.4× less per token ($0.9 vs $1.305 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | DeepSeek V4 Pro | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#32
/ 126
Usable
|
#124
/ 126
Weak
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#6
/ 109
Usable
|
#89
/ 109
Weak
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#25
/ 110
Strong
|
#108
/ 110
Weak
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Executive Assistant |
#38
/ 112
Strong
|
#107
/ 112
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Content & Brand |
#29
/ 124
Strong
|
#96
/ 124
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#27
/ 113
Excellent
|
#94
/ 113
Strong
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Training & Education |
#41
/ 110
Excellent
|
#106
/ 110
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Sales |
#44
/ 110
Usable
|
#108
/ 110
Weak
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Coding |
#43
/ 115
Strong
|
#105
/ 115
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Creative & Comedy | #50 / 110 | #108 / 110 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Customer Support |
#52
/ 113
Strong
|
#108
/ 113
Needs editing
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Landing Pages |
#16
/ 72
Strong
|
#68
/ 72
Needs editing
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Presentations & Decks |
#31
/ 110
Excellent
|
#83
/ 110
Strong
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Product & Project Management |
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
#64
/ 110
Strong
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#44
/ 110
Strong
|
#96
/ 110
Needs editing
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| AI Strategy |
#68
/ 126
Strong
|
#119
/ 126
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Translation & Localization |
#32
/ 110
Excellent
|
#82
/ 110
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#55
/ 110
Excellent
|
#104
/ 110
Strong
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Legal & HR |
#40
/ 110
Excellent
|
#81
/ 110
Strong
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Investor & Pitch |
#33
/ 66
Strong
|
#66
/ 66
Weak
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Data & Analytics |
#60
/ 110
Excellent
|
#92
/ 110
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Structured Output |
#23
/ 113
Excellent
|
#33
/ 113
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than MiniMax M2.7?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks higher in 22 and MiniMax M2.7 in 0.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiniMax M2.7?
MiniMax M2.7 costs 1.4× less per token ($0.9 vs $1.305 per 1M).
What is DeepSeek V4 Pro better at?
DeepSeek V4 Pro out-ranks MiniMax M2.7 at Chef / Home Cooking, Frontend & Landing Pages, Knowledge & Docs.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals