Claude Sonnet 5
VS
DeepSeek V3.2
Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V3.2: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Claude Sonnet 5 wins 16 of 22 task areas we tested; DeepSeek V3.2 takes 6. DeepSeek V3.2 costs 21.0× less per token ($0.572 vs $12 per 1M).
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 21.0× less per token ($0.572 vs $12 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Claude Sonnet 5 | DeepSeek V3.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Strategy |
#2
/ 126
Strong
|
#102
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Coding |
#6
/ 115
Excellent
|
#100
/ 115
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Sales |
#16
/ 110
Strong
|
#91
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Presentations & Decks |
#22
/ 110
Excellent
|
#81
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Data & Analytics |
#16
/ 110
Excellent
|
#69
/ 110
Excellent
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#28
/ 126
Usable
|
#78
/ 126
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Translation & Localization |
#41
/ 110
Excellent
|
#89
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#18
/ 110
Strong
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Product & Project Management |
#61
/ 110
Strong
|
#21
/ 110
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
#53
/ 110
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Landing Pages |
#12
/ 72
Strong
|
#48
/ 72
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Legal & HR |
#57
/ 110
Excellent
|
#90
/ 110
Strong
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#57
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#25
/ 109
Needs editing
|
DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Content & Brand |
#67
/ 124
Strong
|
#95
/ 124
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#58
/ 110
Excellent
|
#30
/ 110
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Customer Support |
#57
/ 113
Strong
|
#74
/ 113
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Training & Education |
#52
/ 110
Excellent
|
#38
/ 110
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Creative & Comedy | #79 / 110 | #87 / 110 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Investor & Pitch |
#39
/ 66
Usable
|
#46
/ 66
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Executive Assistant |
#72
/ 112
Strong
|
#76
/ 112
Usable
|
Claude Sonnet 5 |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#86
/ 113
Excellent
|
#83
/ 113
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Structured Output |
#69
/ 113
Strong
|
#67
/ 113
Strong
|
DeepSeek V3.2 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than DeepSeek V3.2?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 5 ranks higher in 16 and DeepSeek V3.2 in 6.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V3.2?
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 21.0× less per token ($0.572 vs $12 per 1M).
What is Claude Sonnet 5 better at?
Claude Sonnet 5 out-ranks DeepSeek V3.2 at AI Strategy, Coding, Sales.
What is DeepSeek V3.2 better at?
DeepSeek V3.2 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 5 at Product & Project Management, Frontend & Landing Pages, Summarization & Meeting Notes.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals