GLM 5
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
GLM 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Qwen3.7 Max wins 19 of 22 task areas we tested; GLM 5 takes 3. GLM 5 costs 2.0× less per token ($2.52 vs $5 per 1M).
GLM 5 costs 2.0× less per token ($2.52 vs $5 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | GLM 5 | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured Output |
#94
/ 113
Strong
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Creative & Comedy | #72 / 110 | #9 / 110 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#76
/ 109
Weak
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Landing Pages |
#69
/ 72
Needs editing
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Executive Assistant |
#62
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Training & Education |
#67
/ 110
Strong
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Product & Project Management |
#58
/ 110
Strong
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Content & Brand |
#60
/ 124
Strong
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#47
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Sales |
#68
/ 110
Usable
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Investor & Pitch |
#62
/ 66
Usable
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Presentations & Decks |
#49
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#48
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#66
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Data & Analytics |
#43
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Translation & Localization |
#26
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#35
/ 113
Strong
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Coding |
#36
/ 115
Strong
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#57
/ 126
Usable
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
GLM 5 |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#48
/ 110
Strong
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
GLM 5 |
| Legal & HR |
#37
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
GLM 5 |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is GLM 5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 19 and GLM 5 in 3.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
GLM 5 costs 2.0× less per token ($2.52 vs $5 per 1M).
What is GLM 5 better at?
GLM 5 out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Knowledge & Docs, Research & Competitive Analysis, Legal & HR.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks GLM 5 at Structured Output, Creative & Comedy, Frontend & Landing Pages.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals