Grok 4.20 Beta
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
Grok 4.20 Beta vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Qwen3.7 Max wins 21 of 22 task areas we tested; Grok 4.20 Beta takes 1. Qwen3.7 Max costs 1.6× less per token ($5 vs $8 per 1M).
Qwen3.7 Max costs 1.6× less per token ($5 vs $8 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Grok 4.20 Beta | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#93
/ 113
Strong
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Content & Brand |
#99
/ 124
Usable
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Translation & Localization |
#90
/ 110
Strong
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Creative & Comedy | #92 / 110 | #9 / 110 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#95
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Data & Analytics |
#91
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Training & Education |
#76
/ 110
Strong
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Executive Assistant |
#69
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#72
/ 113
Usable
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Legal & HR |
#106
/ 110
Strong
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Coding |
#77
/ 115
Strong
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#86
/ 110
Usable
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Landing Pages |
#60
/ 72
Usable
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Presentations & Decks |
#56
/ 110
Strong
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Structured Output |
#43
/ 113
Excellent
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#86
/ 110
Needs editing
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Investor & Pitch |
#43
/ 66
Usable
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Product & Project Management |
#31
/ 110
Excellent
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Sales |
#46
/ 110
Usable
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#32
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#49
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#38
/ 126
Usable
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
Grok 4.20 Beta |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Grok 4.20 Beta better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 21 and Grok 4.20 Beta in 1.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Beta or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max costs 1.6× less per token ($5 vs $8 per 1M).
What is Grok 4.20 Beta better at?
Grok 4.20 Beta out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Chef / Home Cooking.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks Grok 4.20 Beta at RAG, Safety & Grounding, Content & Brand, Translation & Localization.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals