Gemini 3.8 Flash: Manchester store investment review
For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
816
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
75%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
In detail
Slide 2 quotes 14,200: the landlord's unverified footfall figure of 14,200 people a day.
Slide 1: 3 body text boxes set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: 3 body text boxes set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 4: A body text box set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 1PolishedMain title is a topic label ('Capital Allocation Decision: Tib Street, Manchester'); the decision itself lives only in the card headings
Slide 2AcceptableThe title describes the analysis rather than stating the key takeaway from the adjustment.Left card has a large empty area in its lower third
Slide 3AcceptableThe decisive payback values and pass/fail results are not visually highlighted in the table.Table headers and Board Rule cells wrap awkwardly ('Board Rule (≤ 36 Mos)', 'FAILS (+6 months)')
Slide 4Polished
Slide 5AcceptableThe title is a topic label, and the three takeaway cards have equal emphasis rather than establishing one main conclusion.Title is a topic label rather than a takeaway
Slide 6PolishedCards are bottom-heavy with large empty space under the text
