Claude Haiku 4.5: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026
For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
635
Slides
6 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
58%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 5: text 6: #2BB673 on #F5F5F5 is 2.4:1.
Slide 5: text 7: #2BB673 on #F5F5F5 is 2.4:1.
Slide 5: text 1 and text 2 collide.
Slide 6: text 3: #2BB673 on #F0F4FF is 2.4:1.
Slide 1AcceptableThe title and subtitle are clustered at the top, leaving most of the slide unused; the cover feels plain and top-heavy.Lots of unused white space
Slide 2PolishedThe Q3 '10%' data label touches the top border of the chart frame
Slide 3Polished
Slide 4AcceptableA large gap separates the table from its interpretation, weakening their visual connection.The table is plain and nothing in it draws the eye to the near-identical churn figures
Slide 5Needs workThe two-line title overlaps the Investment heading, making that heading difficult to read.The title wraps to a second line and collides with the 'Investment' label beneath it
Slide 6AcceptableThe recommendation panel is much larger than its contents, leaving excessive empty space below and to the right.'Recommendation' is a topic label; a takeaway title would serve better
