Benchmarks / DeckBench / Lumio

Measured by Spring Prompt

Claude Opus 5.5: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,356
Slides
9 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
72%

Why it is not presentable

  • A slide the judges rated as needing work
  1. Slide 1 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 1Polished
  2. Slide 2 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 2Acceptable The oversized cards leave substantial empty space below their text.The three cards are much taller than their text, leaving the lower half of each card empty
  3. Slide 3 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 3Polished
  4. Slide 4 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 4Polished
  5. Slide 5 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 5Needs work The chart subtitle is clipped at its right edge, cutting off the end of '(212 answers)'.The chart title runs past the plot area and is clipped at the right edge: the closing bracket of '(212 answers)' is cut off
  6. Slide 6 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 6Polished
  7. Slide 7 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 7Acceptable The comparison table is text-heavy, with the main cost and expected-effect figures receiving little visual emphasis.A large empty band sits between the table and the footnote, so the slide feels top-heavy
  8. Slide 8 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 8Acceptable Both cards are much taller than their content requires, leaving large empty lower areas.The cards are oversized for their content, leaving the bottom half of each empty
  9. Slide 9 of Claude Opus 5.5's deck
    Slide 9Polished