Benchmarks / DeckBench / Lumio
Measured by Spring Prompt
Qwen3.8 Max (0902): Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026
For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.
- Verdict
- Not presentable
- Deck rating
- 1,112
- Slides
- 6 (brief: 6-10)
- Design quality
- 75%
Why it is not presentable
- Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
- Made a material claim the analysis does not support
- A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
- Slide 2: “The logo churn chart gives Starter Q1–Q4 as 610.0%, 640.0%, 980.0%, 660.0%; Growth as 290.0%, 310.0%, 300.0%, 280.0%; and Enterprise as 120.0%, 90.0%, 110.0%, 100.0%. These are all 100 times the percentages in the analysis.” is not supported by the analysis.
- Slide 2: “Line chart data shows churn values 100 times too large (e.g. Starter Q1 610.0%, Q3 980.0%; Growth Q1 290.0%; Enterprise Q1 120.0%) instead of 6.1%, 9.8%, 2.9%, 1.2%” is not supported by the analysis.
- Slide 2: “Logo churn for Starter was 610.0% in Q1, 640.0% in Q2, 980.0% in Q3, and 660.0% in Q4 (and similar 100x overstatements for Growth and Enterprise)” is not supported by the analysis.
- Slide 2: text 4: 11.5 pt body text.
- Slide 2: text 5: 11.5 pt body text.
- Slide 2: text 5: 11.5 pt body text.
- Slide 2: text 6: 11.5 pt body text.
