Benchmarks / DeckBench / Lumio

Measured by Spring Prompt

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
867
Slides
6 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
50%

Why it is not presentable

  • A slide the judges rated as needing work
  1. Slide 1 of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's deck
    Slide 1Acceptable The title wraps with only '2026' on the second line, creating an awkward break in the date.Title wraps awkwardly, leaving '2026' orphaned on its own line
  2. Slide 2 of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's deck
    Slide 2Polished The 9.8% data label collides with the top border of the plot frame
  3. Slide 3 of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's deck
    Slide 3Needs work The explanatory text overflows the grey callout: 'Only 18% cited price.' sits outside its bottom edge, and the preceding line has insufficient bottom padding.Callout text overflows its grey box: 'Only 18% cited price.' spills below the box edge
  4. Slide 4 of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's deck
    Slide 4Acceptable The chart and table repeat the same churn comparison, adding visual density without a distinct second message.The chart title 'Six-Month Churn by Onboarding' overlaps the 41% data label on the middle bar
  5. Slide 5 of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's deck
    Slide 5Acceptable The key financial impact, £1.1m per year, is buried in a paragraph rather than highlighted.The bottom third of the slide is empty, so the layout feels top-heavy
  6. Slide 6 of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's deck
    Slide 6Acceptable The recommendation is presented as a long bullet list rather than a decision-focused visual layout.Text-heavy bullet list with no visual anchor for the key numbers (£180k cost, 4-point churn drop)