Benchmarks / DeckBench / Lumio

Measured by Spring Prompt

Mistral Large 4: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
515
Slides
8 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
69%

Why it is not presentable

  • Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
  • Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
  • Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
  • Made a material claim the analysis does not support
  • A slide the judges rated as needing work

In detail

  • Slide 8 quotes 104%: finance's unreconciled preliminary net revenue retention of 104%.
  • Slide 5: “£180k per year is 6% of the price-cut cost.” is not supported by the analysis.
  • Slide 6: “Onboarding completion drives the 3x churn difference; the programme has a proven mechanism.” is not supported by the analysis.
  • Slide 7: “£180k is 6% of the price-cut cost.” is not supported by the analysis.
  • Slide 5: “£180k per year — 6% of the price-cut cost (£180k against £1.1m is about 16%)” is not supported by the analysis.
  • Slide 7: “£180k is 6% of the price-cut cost (£180k against £1.1m is about 16%)” is not supported by the analysis.
  • Slide 5: “6% of the price-cut cost” is not supported by the analysis.
  • Slide 7: “£180k is 6% of the price-cut cost” is not supported by the analysis.
  1. Slide 1 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 1Polished The text-only cover leaves a large unused lower area; the decision statement could be given stronger visual emphasis.
  2. Slide 2 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 2Acceptable The Q3 9.8% label sits against the chart's top border and needs more headroom.The 9.8% data label collides with the top border of the plot frame
  3. Slide 3 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 3Needs work The right chart title is visibly incomplete, ending with '212 Starter accounts,'; shorten it or wrap it within the available space.The right chart title is cut off mid-phrase: 'Exit survey: main reason for cancelling (212 Starter accounts,'
  4. Slide 4 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 4Polished
  5. Slide 5 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 5Polished The chart title 'Projected six-month Starter churn' collides with the 24.6% bar label
  6. Slide 6 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 6Acceptable The generic title does not state the comparison's takeaway.The title is a topic label rather than a takeaway (e.g. 'Onboarding wins on cost, evidence and risk')
  7. Slide 7 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 7Polished Four long supporting bullets make the lower half text-heavy.
  8. Slide 8 of Mistral Large 4's deck
    Slide 8Acceptable The slide presents several reference points rather than one immediately identifiable main message.Text-heavy, with long bullet sentences in a small font