Gemini 3.8 Flash: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026
For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
904
Slides
7 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
71%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
In detail
Slide 7 quotes 104%: finance's unreconciled preliminary net revenue retention of 104%.
Slide 3: text 4: #2BB673 on #F8F9FA is 2.5:1.
Slide 6: text 3: #2BB673 on #F8F9FA is 2.5:1.
Slide 6: text 5: #2BB673 on #F8F9FA is 2.5:1.
Slide 7: text 5: #2BB673 on #F8F9FA is 2.5:1.
Slide 1PolishedText inside the decision box sits in its upper half, leaving the lower part of the box empty
Slide 2AcceptableThe title names the section rather than stating the recommendation.Square-cornered red and green accent bars sit across the rounded tops of the cards, so the card corners look clipped and misaligned
Slide 3PolishedData labels collide with markers and lines (6.4%, 6.6%), and the 9.8% label touches the top of the chart frame
Slide 4Polished
Slide 5AcceptableA large empty gap separates the test-results table from the financial-impact box.Small table leaves a large empty gap above the red financial-impact box, so the left column is unbalanced
Slide 6AcceptableThe three cards contain substantial unused space beneath their text.All three cards are top-heavy, with roughly half of each card empty
Slide 7AcceptableThe generic title does not identify the primary approval requested.Both cards leave their lower halves empty
