DeepSeek V4 Pro
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Qwen3.7 Max wins 17 of 22 task areas we tested; DeepSeek V4 Pro takes 5. DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 3.8× less per token ($1.305 vs $5 per 1M).
DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 3.8× less per token ($1.305 vs $5 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data & Analytics |
#60
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#55
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Creative & Comedy | #50 / 110 | #9 / 110 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#52
/ 113
Strong
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#68
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Executive Assistant |
#38
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Translation & Localization |
#32
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Training & Education |
#41
/ 110
Excellent
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#27
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Coding |
#43
/ 115
Strong
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Presentations & Decks |
#31
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Structured Output |
#23
/ 113
Excellent
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Sales |
#44
/ 110
Usable
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Content & Brand |
#29
/ 124
Strong
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#32
/ 126
Usable
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Investor & Pitch |
#33
/ 66
Strong
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#44
/ 110
Strong
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#25
/ 110
Strong
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#6
/ 109
Usable
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Landing Pages |
#16
/ 72
Strong
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Legal & HR |
#40
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Product & Project Management |
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 17 and DeepSeek V4 Pro in 5.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?
DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 3.8× less per token ($1.305 vs $5 per 1M).
What is DeepSeek V4 Pro better at?
DeepSeek V4 Pro out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Chef / Home Cooking, Research & Competitive Analysis, Knowledge & Docs.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks DeepSeek V4 Pro at Data & Analytics, Summarization & Meeting Notes, Creative & Comedy.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals