Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
VS
Kimi K2.7 Code
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 14 of 22 task areas we tested; Kimi K2.7 Code takes 8. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 3.3× less per token ($4.24 vs $14 per 1M).
Kimi K2.7 Code costs 3.3× less per token ($4.24 vs $14 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Kimi K2.7 Code | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#6
/ 126
Strong
|
#58
/ 126
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#4
/ 110
Excellent
|
#47
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Creative & Comedy | #4 / 110 | #44 / 110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Content & Brand |
#11
/ 124
Strong
|
#48
/ 124
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Training & Education |
#4
/ 110
Excellent
|
#39
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Translation & Localization |
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
#48
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Structured Output |
#15
/ 113
Excellent
|
#46
/ 113
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Coding |
#64
/ 115
Strong
|
#41
/ 115
Strong
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#42
/ 110
Strong
|
#20
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#34
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#54
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Presentations & Decks |
#24
/ 110
Excellent
|
#5
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Sales |
#32
/ 110
Strong
|
#48
/ 110
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Product & Project Management |
#25
/ 110
Excellent
|
#10
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#8
/ 113
Excellent
|
#21
/ 113
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| AI Strategy |
#33
/ 126
Strong
|
#44
/ 126
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Customer Support |
#2
/ 113
Strong
|
#10
/ 113
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Data & Analytics |
#39
/ 110
Excellent
|
#31
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Executive Assistant |
#14
/ 112
Strong
|
#6
/ 112
Strong
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#19
/ 110
Strong
|
#16
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Landing Pages |
#14
/ 72
Strong
|
#17
/ 72
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Legal & HR |
#17
/ 110
Excellent
|
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Investor & Pitch |
#13
/ 66
Strong
|
#15
/ 66
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher in 14 and Kimi K2.7 Code in 8.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code costs 3.3× less per token ($4.24 vs $14 per 1M).
What is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better at?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview out-ranks Kimi K2.7 Code at Chef / Home Cooking, Summarization & Meeting Notes, Creative & Comedy.
What is Kimi K2.7 Code better at?
Kimi K2.7 Code out-ranks Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at Coding, Research & Competitive Analysis, Presentations & Decks.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals