Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
VS
MiniMax M2.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiniMax M2.7: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 22 of 22 task areas we tested; MiniMax M2.7 takes 0. MiniMax M2.7 costs 15.6× less per token ($0.9 vs $14 per 1M).
MiniMax M2.7 costs 15.6× less per token ($0.9 vs $14 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#6
/ 126
Strong
|
#124
/ 126
Weak
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Customer Support |
#2
/ 113
Strong
|
#108
/ 113
Needs editing
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Creative & Comedy | #4 / 110 | #108 / 110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Training & Education |
#4
/ 110
Excellent
|
#106
/ 110
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#4
/ 110
Excellent
|
#104
/ 110
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Executive Assistant |
#14
/ 112
Strong
|
#107
/ 112
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#19
/ 110
Strong
|
#108
/ 110
Weak
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| AI Strategy |
#33
/ 126
Strong
|
#119
/ 126
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#8
/ 113
Excellent
|
#94
/ 113
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Content & Brand |
#11
/ 124
Strong
|
#96
/ 124
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Sales |
#32
/ 110
Strong
|
#108
/ 110
Weak
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Translation & Localization |
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
#82
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Legal & HR |
#17
/ 110
Excellent
|
#81
/ 110
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Presentations & Decks |
#24
/ 110
Excellent
|
#83
/ 110
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#34
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#89
/ 109
Weak
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Landing Pages |
#14
/ 72
Strong
|
#68
/ 72
Needs editing
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#42
/ 110
Strong
|
#96
/ 110
Needs editing
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Data & Analytics |
#39
/ 110
Excellent
|
#92
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Investor & Pitch |
#13
/ 66
Strong
|
#66
/ 66
Weak
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Coding |
#64
/ 115
Strong
|
#105
/ 115
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Product & Project Management |
#25
/ 110
Excellent
|
#64
/ 110
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Structured Output |
#15
/ 113
Excellent
|
#33
/ 113
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than MiniMax M2.7?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher in 22 and MiniMax M2.7 in 0.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax M2.7?
MiniMax M2.7 costs 15.6× less per token ($0.9 vs $14 per 1M).
What is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better at?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview out-ranks MiniMax M2.7 at Chef / Home Cooking, Customer Support, Creative & Comedy.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals