Kimi K3.1 Pro: Manchester store investment review

For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.

Verdict: Not presentable
Deck rating: 1,259
Slides: 4 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality: 88%

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read

In detail

4 slides; the brief allows 5-8.
Slide 1: A body text box set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 1: 3 body text boxes set at 11.5 pt, too small to read
Slide 1: A body text box set at 11.2 pt, too small to read
Slide 1: A text box set at 8.5 pt, too small to read
Slide 1: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read

Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
Slide 2Download slide imagePolished All bars use the same navy, so the business-case assumption and the pop-up adjusted bar are not set apart from the benchmarks
Slide 3Download slide imagePolished Large empty gap between the table and the footnote leaves the footnote floating, detached from the table it qualifies
Slide 4Download slide imageAcceptable The short table leaves a large unused area beneath it, making the main content feel weighted toward the right-hand panel.Large empty area below the table on the left makes the layout feel unbalanced