GPT-6.1 Sol: Responsive repairs: in-house team or renewed contract
For the board of trustees of a housing association, including two tenant board members. The decision it supports: whether to approve £1.2m to set up an in-house repairs team or renew the contract.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,412
Slides
6 (brief: 6-9)
Design quality
42%
Why it is not presentable
A slide the judges rated as needing work
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Needs workThe upper-right metric card is too short for its text: 'April → March' sits against the bottom edge with no padding. Increase the card height or tighten the internal spacing.In the top KPI card ('9 → 17 days'), the label text runs right to the bottom edge of the box with no padding, so it looks like it is spilling out; the second card has proper padding, so the two cards do not match
Slide 3Needs workThe explanatory text in both comparison panels is cramped against the bottom edges, leaving almost no padding beneath the final lines. Increase the panel heights or reduce the text.Body text in both cards ('is recorded separately.' and 'after allowing for the change.') sits on, or is clipped by, the bottom edge of its card
Slide 4AcceptableThe left panel is text-heavy, with a long bold explanation beneath the headline number.In the left panel, the bold statement ends hard against the bottom of the box ('still waiting.'), with almost no bottom padding compared with the top
Slide 5PolishedLarge empty space beneath the table makes the layout feel unbalanced
Slide 6Needs workThe right-hand rationale extends below the other columns, and the orange horizontal rule crosses through 'payback.' Shorten the text, widen the column, or move the rule below all three text blocks.The third reason column overflows: 'payback.' collides with, and is struck through by, the orange rule