Benchmarks / DeckBench / Northgate Homes

1. 
   Slide 1Acceptable The title presents the choice rather than the recommendation; the actual decision requested is considerably smaller and less prominent.Title wraps and leaves 'contract?' alone on the second line
2. 
   Slide 2Acceptable Both panels are text-heavy, with limited emphasis on the key figures.Title is a topic label ('Executive summary') rather than a takeaway
3. 
   Slide 3Polished
4. 
   Slide 4Acceptable The chart does not annotate the October system change or visually distinguish the reporting effect from the adjusted demand increase.The chart shows only the raw October jump and no adjusted series, so the visual undercuts the title's point that real demand rose
5. 
   Slide 5Acceptable The two explanatory boxes repeat much of the same caveat, adding text without strengthening the visual message.The large 92% is the dominant element even though the message is that satisfaction is misleading; this competes with the title
6. 
   Slide 6Acceptable The table, chart and cost-position bullets repeat the same comparison.Large gap under the table
7. 
   Slide 7Acceptable The recommendation panel contains several long bullets, making the slide text-heavy.Text-heavy and repeats the executive summary
8. 
   Slide 8Acceptable The dense table is suitable for reference but lacks emphasis to guide viewers toward important rows or changes.Bottom third of the slide is empty