Kimi K3: Responsive repairs: in-house team or renewed contract

For the board of trustees of a housing association, including two tenant board members. The decision it supports: whether to approve £1.2m to set up an in-house repairs team or renew the contract.

Verdict: Not presentable
Deck rating: 1,255
Slides: 8 (brief: 6-9)
Design quality: 88%

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read

In detail

Slide 1: shape 1 extends past the slide edge.
Slide 2: text 5: 11.5 pt body text.
Slide 2: text 9: 11.5 pt body text.
Slide 2: text 13: 11 pt body text.
Slide 8: shape 1 extends past the slide edge.

Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished The title is a topic label ('The decision before the board today'). The recommendation in the teal box would work better as the takeaway title.
Slide 3Polished
Slide 4Acceptable The right-hand explanation is text-heavy, with several multiline bullets that slow scanning.The October counting change behind the sharp jump is not marked on the chart. Viewers must read the caption and bullets to understand the step.
Slide 5Acceptable The large teal '92%' on the right competes with the title's 64% complaints message, and it argues the opposite way at first glance.The right bar (1870) extends past the top of the y-axis limit (1750), making the chart look broken.
Slide 6Polished The left bar (4.3) exceeds the maximum tick on the y-axis (4.0), extending out of the standard chart area.
Slide 7Polished The step cards are much taller than their text, leaving their lower halves empty.
Slide 8Polished