Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Responsive repairs: in-house team or renewed contract
For the board of trustees of a housing association, including two tenant board members. The decision it supports: whether to approve £1.2m to set up an in-house repairs team or renew the contract.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
867
Slides
6 (brief: 6-9)
Design quality
50%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 6: text 3: text runs off the slide.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished
Slide 3Needs workThe final bullet spills below the white content panel, with the panel border crossing through its text.The last bullet spills out of the white content box; the box's bottom border cuts through the first line of text.
Slide 4AcceptableThe right column is text-heavy, particularly the satisfaction-survey explanation.The '1,870' data label collides with the chart title 'Formal complaints about repairs'.
Slide 5AcceptableA large empty gap separates the table from the financial-case section.There is a large empty gap between the table and the 'The Financial Case' block, so the slide feels unbalanced.
Slide 6Needs workThe final orange recommendation is cut off by the bottom edge of the slide.The third bullet, 'Do not proceed with a full contract renewal.', is cut off at the bottom edge of the slide.
