Measured by Spring Prompt

Muse Wonder: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict: Not presentable
Deck rating: 1,273
Slides: 8 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality: 81%

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
A slide the judges rated as needing work

In detail

Slide 1: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 3: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 4: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 5: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 6: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 7: 2 body text boxes set at 11 pt, too small to read

Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Needs work The symbols after 'FUND' and 'DO NOT FUND' appear as missing-glyph boxes; replace them with supported icons or remove them.Missing-glyph boxes (tofu) appear after 'FUND' and 'DO NOT FUND'; the icon characters failed to render
Slide 3Polished The '9.8%' data label collides with the top border of the plot frame
Slide 4Polished Both bars use the same colour, so the 'did not complete' bar gets no extra emphasis
Slide 5Polished Every bar is the same colour; the setup bar and the price bar are not highlighted against the others
Slide 6Acceptable The table repeats the chart's prices and churn percentages, adding visual weight mainly to communicate two sign-up counts.The '9.7%' label is crammed against the chart title and the axis top
Slide 7Polished The bottom third of the slide is empty, so the layout feels top-heavy
Slide 8Polished A large empty middle separates the decision list from the closing takeaway, weakening the layout's balance.