Muse Wonder: Library services: choosing how to save £350,000
For the council's cabinet (elected members), meeting in public. The decision it supports: which of three options to adopt to save £350,000 a year from libraries.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,273
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
75%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
In detail
Slide 2: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 3: Chart labels at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 3: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 4: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 5: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2PolishedOption cards are much taller than their content, leaving the bottom half of each card empty
Slide 3AcceptableChart labels and cost-table text are relatively small for a public-meeting presentation.The title wraps and leaves the single word 'books' orphaned on the second line
Slide 4AcceptableThe 'Read this with care' box is oversized, and its lower half is emptyThe callout text on the right feels a bit long and dense, which competes with the chart.
Slide 5AcceptableThe title describes the assessment rather than stating its conclusion.Large empty gap between the table and the bottom callout makes the layout feel unbalanced
Slide 6PolishedThe safeguard card is much taller than its text, leaving its lower half empty
