Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

DeepSeek DeepSeek V4 Pro VS Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 19 of 22 task areas we tested; DeepSeek V4 Pro takes 3. DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 10.7× less per token ($1.305 vs $14 per 1M).

3
Task areas won
19
67
Avg percentile
82
0
Top-3 finishes
1
$1.3
Price / 1M tokens
$14.0
DeepSeek
Provider
Google

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 10.7× less per token ($1.305 vs $14 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area DeepSeek V4 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Winner
Summarization & Meeting Notes #55 / 110
Excellent
#4 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Customer Support #52 / 113
Strong
#2 / 113
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Creative & Comedy #50 / 110 #4 / 110 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Training & Education #41 / 110
Excellent
#4 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
AI Strategy #68 / 126
Strong
#33 / 126
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Frontend & Landing Pages #6 / 109
Usable
#34 / 109
Needs editing
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Chef / Home Cooking #32 / 126
Usable
#6 / 126
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Executive Assistant #38 / 112
Strong
#14 / 112
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Legal & HR #40 / 110
Excellent
#17 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Coding #43 / 115
Strong
#64 / 115
Strong
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Data & Analytics #60 / 110
Excellent
#39 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Investor & Pitch #33 / 66
Strong
#13 / 66
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
RAG, Safety & Grounding #27 / 113
Excellent
#8 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Content & Brand #29 / 124
Strong
#11 / 124
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Translation & Localization #32 / 110
Excellent
#14 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Product & Project Management #12 / 110
Excellent
#25 / 110
Excellent
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Sales #44 / 110
Usable
#32 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Structured Output #23 / 113
Excellent
#15 / 113
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Presentations & Decks #31 / 110
Excellent
#24 / 110
Excellent
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Knowledge & Docs #25 / 110
Strong
#19 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Landing Pages #16 / 72
Strong
#14 / 72
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Research & Competitive Analysis #44 / 110
Strong
#42 / 110
Strong
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher in 19 and DeepSeek V4 Pro in 3.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 10.7× less per token ($1.305 vs $14 per 1M).

What is DeepSeek V4 Pro better at?

DeepSeek V4 Pro out-ranks Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at Frontend & Landing Pages, Coding, Product & Project Management.

What is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better at?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview out-ranks DeepSeek V4 Pro at Summarization & Meeting Notes, Customer Support, Creative & Comedy.

Full DeepSeek V4 Pro review → Full Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview review → Full model leaderboard →

More comparisons

This page is Spring Prompt, running in public

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s