Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
VS
Qwen3.7 Max
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max: which wins at real work?
22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.
Qwen3.7 Max wins 12 of 22 task areas we tested; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 10. Qwen3.7 Max costs 2.8× less per token ($5 vs $14 per 1M).
Qwen3.7 Max costs 2.8× less per token ($5 vs $14 per 1M).
Task by task
| Task area | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding |
#64
/ 115
Strong
|
#19
/ 115
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Chef / Home Cooking |
#6
/ 126
Strong
|
#47
/ 126
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Legal & HR |
#17
/ 110
Excellent
|
#46
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Data & Analytics |
#39
/ 110
Excellent
|
#15
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Frontend & Landing Pages |
#34
/ 109
Needs editing
|
#14
/ 109
Needs editing
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Product & Project Management |
#25
/ 110
Excellent
|
#7
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Research & Competitive Analysis |
#42
/ 110
Strong
|
#58
/ 110
Usable
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Knowledge & Docs |
#19
/ 110
Strong
|
#34
/ 110
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Presentations & Decks |
#24
/ 110
Excellent
|
#9
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Structured Output |
#15
/ 113
Excellent
|
#2
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Translation & Localization |
#14
/ 110
Excellent
|
#1
/ 110
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Customer Support |
#2
/ 113
Strong
|
#11
/ 113
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Training & Education |
#4
/ 110
Excellent
|
#13
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Sales |
#32
/ 110
Strong
|
#24
/ 110
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes |
#4
/ 110
Excellent
|
#12
/ 110
Excellent
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Executive Assistant |
#14
/ 112
Strong
|
#7
/ 112
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding |
#8
/ 113
Excellent
|
#1
/ 113
Excellent
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| Investor & Pitch |
#13
/ 66
Strong
|
#19
/ 66
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Creative & Comedy | #4 / 110 | #9 / 110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Landing Pages |
#14
/ 72
Strong
|
#10
/ 72
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
| AI Strategy |
#33
/ 126
Strong
|
#36
/ 126
Strong
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Content & Brand |
#11
/ 124
Strong
|
#10
/ 124
Strong
|
Qwen3.7 Max |
Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.
Frequently asked
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher in 12 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 10.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max costs 2.8× less per token ($5 vs $14 per 1M).
What is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better at?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview out-ranks Qwen3.7 Max at Chef / Home Cooking, Legal & HR, Research & Competitive Analysis.
What is Qwen3.7 Max better at?
Qwen3.7 Max out-ranks Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at Coding, Data & Analytics, Frontend & Landing Pages.
More comparisons
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals