Benchmarks / DeckBench / Hearthside Coffee

Measured by Spring Prompt

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: Manchester store investment review

For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
820
Slides
7 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
79%

Why it is not presentable

  • Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
  • Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides

In detail

  • Slide 6 quotes 14,200: the landlord's unverified footfall figure of 14,200 people a day.
  1. Slide 1 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
  2. Slide 2 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable The title describes the test rather than stating its main finding.Title describes the test rather than stating a takeaway
  3. Slide 3 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 3Download slide imageAcceptable All bars use the same colour, so the adjusted pop-up result and business-case comparison are not visually prioritised.All bars share one colour, so 'Pop-up adjusted' and 'Business case' are not visually contrasted
  4. Slide 4 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 4Download slide imageAcceptable The compact table and large gap beneath it leave the left column visually unbalanced against the taller chart.Chart has no 36-month threshold line; the rule appears only as text below the chart
  5. Slide 5 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 5Download slide imagePolished Leeds bar is not highlighted, although it is the focus of the slide
  6. Slide 6 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 6Download slide imagePolished Square-cornered orange top bars sit on rounded cards, so the corners do not match
  7. Slide 7 of GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal's deck
    Slide 7Download slide imagePolished