Claude Haiku 5.5: Responsive repairs: in-house team or renewed contract
For the board of trustees of a housing association, including two tenant board members. The decision it supports: whether to approve £1.2m to set up an in-house repairs team or renew the contract.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,130
Slides
8 (brief: 6-9)
Design quality
69%
Why it is not presentable
Made a material claim the analysis does not support
In detail
Slide 4: “That accounts for about 12% of the reported rise.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 7: “Renewal keeps the current performance.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2AcceptableThe three cards are paragraph-heavy; highlighting the key figures would make the supporting arguments easier to scan.The title wraps to two lines, but the orange accent bar stays at its one-line position, so it sits jammed against the baseline of 'built'.
Slide 3AcceptableThe final value label, 4150, is crowded against the chart's top border.The '4150' data label overlaps the top border of the plot frame.
Slide 4AcceptableThe right-hand panel contains four substantial bullets with little differentiation in emphasis.The title wraps to two lines, and the orange accent bar collides with the second line ('backlog'), cutting through its descenders.
Slide 5PolishedThe title wraps to two lines, and the orange accent bar collides with 'among', cutting through its descenders.
Slide 6AcceptableThe chart, table and bullets repeat the same running-cost comparison, making the slide busier than necessary.The title wraps to two lines, and the orange accent bar collides with 'in about'.
Slide 7AcceptableBoth comparison panels rely on long bullets rather than a quickly scannable set of matched criteria.The title wraps to two lines, and the orange accent bar collides with 'performance', overlapping the descender of the 'p'.
