Gemini 4 Argon: On-time delivery: what is going wrong and what to fund

For the board and the company's three main investors. The decision it supports: whether to fund 40 more drivers or a trunk re-plan with 10 drivers.

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Made a material claim the analysis does not support
A slide the judges rated as needing work

Slide 2: “Preston, Coventry and Swindon held above 94.5% throughout.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 3: “Targeted intervention addresses 60%.” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 4: “Doncaster & Stoke drivers (22% of failures).” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 3: “Targeted intervention addresses 60% (trunking 38% + driver shortage 22%), tackling both top root causes” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 3: “Targeted intervention addresses 60%” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 4: “Doncaster & Stoke drivers (22%)” is not supported by the analysis.
Slide 2: A body text box set at 11 pt, too small to read

Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable The three pale grey depot series are low-contrast and difficult to distinguish from one another.The title is about the 93% contract floor, but the chart has no 93% reference line.
Slide 3Download slide imageNeeds work The chart subtitle is cut off on the right, truncating the reporting period after 'Weeks 33 to 3'.The chart subtitle is cut off at the right edge: '(Weeks 33 to 3'.
Slide 4Download slide imagePolished The comparison cards and bottom table repeat much of the same information, making the slide unnecessarily text-heavy.
Slide 5Download slide imageAcceptable The slide combines a productivity-metric caveat with a funding decision and governance plan, rather than communicating one main point.The title is a topic label, not a takeaway, and reads awkwardly ('recommend action plan').
Slide 6Download slide imageAcceptable The table is legible but gives every value equal emphasis; the key depots and latest-week results are not highlighted.There is a large empty gap between the table and the footnote.