Sign inTest your prompt

Benchmarks / DeckBench / Hearthside Coffee

Measured by Spring Prompt

Gemini 4 Carbon: Manchester store investment review

For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,021
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
58%

Why it is not presentable

  • Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote
  • A slide the judges rated as needing work

In detail

  • Slide 3 quotes 14,200: the landlord's unverified footfall figure of 14,200 people a day.
  1. Slide 1 of Gemini 4 Carbon's deck
    Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
  2. Slide 2 of Gemini 4 Carbon's deck
    Slide 2Download slide imagePolished
  3. Slide 3 of Gemini 4 Carbon's deck
    Slide 3Download slide imageAcceptable All bars use the same colour, so the adjusted pop-up result and base-case comparison are not visually emphasised.All bars are the same colour, so the adjusted pop-up (£2,380) and base case that the title compares are not highlighted
  4. Slide 4 of Gemini 4 Carbon's deck
    Slide 4Download slide imageAcceptable The chart names the 36-month rule but lacks a reference line, leaving viewers to locate the threshold mentally.Chart is titled 'vs. 36m Rule' but no 36-month reference line is drawn; the hurdle appears only as a caption
  5. Slide 5 of Gemini 4 Carbon's deck
    Slide 5Download slide imageNeeds work The final table header breaks 'Turnover' mid-word into 'Turnov' and 'er'; the column needs widening or the header needs reformatting.Table header 'Turnover' breaks mid-word ('Turnov / er')
  6. Slide 6 of Gemini 4 Carbon's deck
    Slide 6Download slide imageAcceptable The three panels are text-heavy, with long, frequently wrapped bullets slowing scanning.Mixed bold and regular bullets within cards look inconsistent